Popular Posts

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Bihar worst in India’s falling birth sex ratio

India’s birth sex ratio has fallen to 893 girls registered for every 1,000 boys born, much less than the overall child sex ratio of India at 914, latest government data on registration of births shows.

The new data for 2009 records a dip from the 903 girls registered per 1,000 boys in 2007.

“A downfall in sex ratio at birth is due to less reporting of registered births from Bihar, Jharkhand and Orissa,” the report said, adding that remarkable improvement in birth registrations was reported from Assam, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Nagaland than previous years.

Bihar was the worst performing with a birth sex ratio of 751, followed by Arunachal Pradesh at 806. The prosperous Haryana is third from bottom with a ratio of 853. Uttarakhand, Rajasthan and Jharkhand too fared badly.

However, not all poor states showed an anti-girl bias with Madhya Pradesh recording a birth sex ratio of 938. Chhattisgarh and Orissa also had higher birth sex ratio than the national average.

The only state to register more new born girls than boys was Karnataka with a birth sex ratio of 1,011. Neighbouring Andhra Pradesh also did well with a ratio of 985. The three north-eastern states of Mizoram, Meghalaya and Manipur had birth sex ratio of about 950.

The data also shows that around 67% of birth registrations take place in cities and just 23% in villages, though 64% of the country’s population lives in rural India. This indicates the inefficacy of the government’s programmes for healthier mother and child in villages through birth registrations.

Source: HT

Nitish Kumar, L K Advani meeting kicks political storm in Bihar

The exchange of greetings between BJP veteran L K Advani and Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar at the National Integration Council meeting in Delhi today, the first since the parting of ways of the NDA allies, has kicked up a political storm in the state with RJD terming it as 'match fixing' and JD(U) defending it as 'normal courtesy'.

As the picture of Advani-Kumar meeting appeared on the TV channels, opposition RJD seized the opportunity and termed it as 'match fixing'.

"We have been saying from the beginning that Nitish Kumar has severed relationship with Narendra Modi BJP but is still with Advani BJP ... The meeting gives ample indication of match fixing between JD(U) and BJP to split the secular votes in the coming Parliamentary elections," RJD Secretary General Ramkripal Yadav told a party function at Nalanda.

"Advani has been guru to Nitish Kumar ... How can he (Kumar) go away from him ... the separation of the two parties is just a drama to divide secular votes," Yadav said.

Defending Kumar's action, Bihar JD(U) president Bashist Narayan Singh told PTI, "Meeting Advani is part of a normal courtesy. Such practises make the democracy strong."

Advaniji is among the few surviving veterans of Indian politics ... After working together for so many years what is the harm in wishing one another despite being in separate parties?" he said flaying the opposition for 'politicising everything'.

"We meet people associated with the JP movement despite the fact that some of them are in different parties. What is wrong in it?" he asked.

Singh said it was common knowledge that JD(U) separated from BJP after 17 years of association on ideological lines. "The decision to break up (with BJP) is final and based on our party ideology. Hence making political statements out of courtesy meeting does not hold any importance," he added.

Bihar BJP too sought to downplay the meeting, describing it as standard practice under political protocol.

"The exchange of greetings by leaders of different political parties is routine practice and take place as per established political protocol," senior BJP leader and former deputy chief minister Sushil Kumar Modi told reporters here.

He at the same time criticised Kumar for his cold vibes towards his Gujarat counterpart Narendra Modi when the two attended a function at the Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi earlier in the year.

Both Kumar and Advani had reacted strongly to Modi's rise in the BJP hierarchy. While Kumar broke the alliance between JD(U) and BJP, Advani had abstained from the national executive at Goa and the parliamentary board meeting where the Gujarat chief minister was elevated as the BJP poll campaign panel chief and the prime ministerial candidate respectively.

Source: ET

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Education infrastructure vs quality—Bihar’s battle within

It was past noon and the mobile phone of Kalpana Kumari Singh, headmistress of a government middle school in Patna, started ringing. Without much ado she picked it up and then without speaking punched a few keys and put down the phone. Turning to apologize, she said, “It’s a headache,” before adding, “It was a call from a computerized machine to know the attendance in the school. I wish somebody had asked us what chapters we taught today.”

Just as she was settling down to the interview, a student walked into the room demanding when she would receive the free books due to her.
“This is what we do most of the time and, often, after the school hours too,” she said, pointing to an under-construction school building in the campus. “Teachers, especially the head teacher, are responsible for overseeing building construction. The government thinks we can do everything— from teaching to clerical work like keeping records of students with their caste, gender demarcations, whether students got free books or not, and become engineers to oversee building work. Then there is mid-day meal monitoring. In the last 10 to 15 years, education has got secondary focus,” she said.
Clearly the trade-off between optimizing the education infrastructure and imparting quality education is not just becoming difficult, but almost impossible to manage given the limited resources on the one hand and the increasing demand for quality on the other.

Poor infrastructure

Bihar now has one of the largest school systems in the country with 19.2 million students just in the elementary schools (Class 1-8). It spends at least 6% of its state gross domestic product (SGDP) on education as against the national average of 4%. But most of the attention is on getting children into schools.
“There are different challenges. We are now giving focus to quality education. We are hiring a private firm through competitive process to identify and improve this as a pilot, before we scale it up across the state. We know the problem,” said primary education secretary Rahul Singh.

Other than the mid-day-meal and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, which the central government runs with state governments, Bihar has at least seven other schemes related to uniforms, free cycles, free books and financial assistance. Instead of separate staff to administer these schemes, teachers shoulder the responsibility for implementing, documenting and being accountable to the government. Besides, they have to take on other duties ranging from distributing below the poverty line (BPL) cards to organizing awareness rallies, election duty and other administrative work as and when the district administration asks.
Akhilesh Prasad Sinha, a retired teacher of the school, agreed. “This school was built in 1929. Instead of this getting a heritage status, we have got a municipal garbage dumping ground at the main gate. That’s our tag. If this is the situation in Patna, imagine the situation in far-off places,” he said, indicating the structural flaws in the system.


A municipal garbage dumping ground in front of a government middle school in Patna. Photo: Pradeep Gaur/Mint“We close our windows to avoid it but it stinks inside the classroom,” said Anjali Kumari, a Class 6 student. Her friends crowd around to narrate their experiences—poor hygiene, lack of school furniture, how they stopped eating mid-day meals after discovering dead insects in the food.
The problems faced by the school in Patna are not unique. In Chappra, some 80km northwest of Patna, the situation is starker. While the school in Patna has one room for every class, at Hari Har Sharan government middle school, there is no such luxury. Inside the school, 11-year-old Kajal Kumari, 13-year-old Sonu Kumar and 14-year-old Pooja Kumari, from Class 6, 7 and 8, respectively, were being taught together.
The air inside the classroom was thick with the stench of an open sewer outside the windows and garbage dumped next to the school kitchen. Just outside the room, scores of children between Class 1 and Class 3 were busy chatting with each other in the verandah. The next room does duty as the classroom for 4 and 5, the storeroom for mid-day-meal rations and the teachers’ common room.
“It’s sad that everybody talks about the enrolment and mid-day-meals, but nobody talks about quality of school education,” said Rupa Kumari, headmistress of another government middle school in Chhapra.
Her school runs from a thatched hall with few facilities. Students sit in separate groups, according to the class they’re in. Tucked behind an overcrowded private nursing home, this school has cut open the thatched roof at places so that light enters the building. Unlike Patna, the computerized attendance system is irregular and they have to maintain paper rolls that display at least six differentiators according to caste and gender.
If the Right to Education Act is implemented in letter, such a school would fail to measure up and may face closure, jeopardizing the education of over 200 students.
According to official data, Bihar needs some 575,324 classrooms for its 70,238 schools but there are only 276,325 classrooms available across the state. Saran district, where 23 students died after eating a mid-day meal that had been contaminated with toxins, alone needs 21,460 classrooms but has 9,887.
“In Bihar, the problem is not all about infrastructure. It’s about implementation,” argued Yamini Aiyar, director of the Accountability Initiative at New Delhi-based Centre for Policy Research.
According to Prabhat P. Ghosh, professor at the Asian Development Research Institute in Patna, Bihar’s education ecosystem has three dimensions—infrastructural deficiency, shortage of teachers, and governance.
“In Bihar, we have schools under the tree, and schools running from somebody’s house,” he said. “It’s not a desirable situation but a reality here.” According to official data, more than 8,500 schools have neither their own building nor land.
“Several government schemes have certainly got students to schools but if you look at the attendance rate, it’s not beyond 70%,” Ghosh said. “And that is the effective enrolment rate as against the government’s claim of near 100%. This is a structural problem and the mid-day meal tragedy is the tip of the iceberg.”
After the 16 July incident, the state has reported four more cases of students falling ill.